Not allowed to say Jai Hind?

~ AM I ALLOWED TO SAY JAI HIND? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ Friends :-(1)One of G+ attendee Mr. Varun Devan(ND TV NEWS) labeled blogger “gtathagat” as an anti national. Blogger “gtathagat” has abused replacement of an actor Mr. Amir Khan with Mr. Amitabh Bacchan, as Indian brand ambassador, calling them respectively, India’s deserter, when just for monitory gain one seeks foreign nationality with younger brother Mr. Ajitabh Bacchan, and other opportunist abuser of nation’s so called tolerance. I must place here that I don’t carry any personal grudge against these both actors. On the contrary I am the greatest fan of greatest acting skill of Mr. Amitabh Bachan. He has the face like a large screen with maximum pixels, which exhibits each and every expression and impression, minutely and finely. Comparing to him most of other actors’ acting skill is like performance on a small, 4’’ or 7” sized screen, with fewer pixels. Lowest rated acting too becomes impressive when seen on small screens (face) of fewer pixels. Amir Khan’s criticizing of Indian’s intolerance is a selfish and opportunist’s attempt of blemishing India’s image. Blogger “gtathagat” is a proven greater abuser of so claimed tolerance of India’s culture than Amir Khan. Blogger “gtathagat” is always seen exposing and badly abusing Indian Hinduism’s legalized authorization of most cruel and inhumane intolerance, toward India’s most deprived, most oppressed and most suppressed original natives’ untouchables’ communities, via its unique but dirtiest caste-system. (2) Being an original native Patriotic Indian like more than 60% of total Indian population which is poor and deprived, it is very sorrow some for blogger “gtathagat” to bear intentionally imposed larger than size images of such well established and rich (Gift of imposed dominance and chances of accumulating wealth, from last 5000 years.) people who are actually treacherous or of no use for India and its deprived majority of peoples. I must mention here again, that when I call myself and majority of others as patriotic, I do not intend to abuse other foreigners of foreign religions too, including first Indian invaders Aryan Brahmans of Prussia, who were unfortunately allowed to be rooted deeply in this Indian soil of original natives. I do not intend to abuse Brahmans’ owned Patriotism boaster organization RSS too, only for non participation of it or of its any activist Brahman, in India’s freedom fight. (3) Indians have peculiar habits. Still they pride in their past kingly or godly figures, which once ruled over them, before British rule, or may have obliged them claiming to be godly images. While doing so, they conveniently ignore that those kingly or godly figures were merely pretentious traders, who for the sake of mere existence of their thrones and seats did not bother to offer anything, including any female member of their families or their religions or culture and traditions too, for those foreign religions’ raiders who became their masters. (4) Same way they prided and respected Brahmans who though are only 3, 1/2% of total Hindus and as Hinduism’s heads exclusively Brahman Shankaracharyas, solely owned and mastered Hinduism by scripting its manifesto “Manusmruti”. Indians’ Level of respect toward Brahman can be gauged when we see them revering Brahmans as next to gods and sipping their foot wash as holy water, though Brahmans are also mere human being like the native Indians. Dirtiest part of such reverence is that, those Non Brahman Hindus, who sipped Brahmans’ foot wash, had to pay price of that dirty foot wash as Dakshana, to that Brahman, who allowed them to sip that dirty foot wash. Generally a servant or today’s waiter bow to master or customer for getting rewarded with tip or gift. But in the case of Brahmans this well known and natural tradition is seen reversed, when a non Brahman Hindu bow before a Brahman, instead of being rewarded by that Brahman, that non Brahman Hindu is seen bound to reward something as Dakshana, to that Brahman. (5)Brahmans served all foreign religions’ raiders, dedicatedly and never opposed conversion of Hindus, forced by their foreign religions’ masters. Now patriotism boaster Brahmans are in fact, most treacherous if history from well imposed so called economist Brahman Chanakya is scanned. This Brahman Chanakya ditched his master king Nanda, for avenging mere insult by king Nanda, with the help of king Nanda’s heir only. (6) Great Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji’s images, idols and name is nowadays vividly seen used by Brahmans’ RSS as symbol of dedicated Hindu king. But Brahmans cleverly hide that they only had black mailed to Shivaji, to extract a huge treasure from Shivaji, by denying performing rituals, on his crowning ceremony. (7) Same way Brahmans had denied to perform rituals at the time of marriage too of Shivaji. That great king Shivaji had to remarry with his already married own wives again, at his age of 41 years. Of course then also these Brahmans did not forget to blackmail Shivaji, and robbed him of huge treasure as before. (8) Publicity skilled Brahmans, when use great Shivaji’s name as enemy of Muslims or Christians, for charming Hindu natives, they intentionally and cunningly hide facts that Shivaji had loyal body guards and soldiers of both Christian and Muslim religions in his army, than these treacherous Brahmans. Shivaji’s army’s gunner was a most loyal Muslim named Ibrahim. Shivaji’s most trusted body guard Madari Mehatar was also Muslim. One unit in charge in his army was a Christian. Shivaji’s one more body guard was a barber by profession. They all were more loyal to great king Shivaji than these black mailers and robbers Brahmans. With strong help of such Non Brahman and Non Hindu colleagues only Shivaji could build an only Maratha kingdom in India. (9) Shivaji’s Muslim body guard Madari Mehatar risked his life to help Shivaji’s ever great escape from Delhi’s Muslim Mughal king Aurangzeb’s prison, by acting as bedridden Shivaji. He did not bother to ditch his own religion’s Muslim king Aurangzeb, without black mailing Shivaji for any simple favor too, like Shivaji’s robber Brahmans. Shivaji’s that Muslim body guard Madari Mehatar’s risk for saving his Hindu king Shivaji could have costed him his life too. (10) Great king Shivaji’s barber body guard(may be Yesaji Kank or so by name..) lost his life for facilitating Shivaji’s escape from a fort besieged by Mughal army, by surrendering himself to Mughal army, in the getup of Shivaji. (11) On the back ground of such dedicated loyalty of above mentioned Non Hindu colleagues of Hindu king Shivaji, Brahmans not only blackmailed Shivaji for huge treasure in exchange of performing simple Hindu rituals too,(which was their bounded duty described in their scripted Hinduism’s Manifesto Manusmruti only), but for his Muslim master Afzal Khan, one bastard of them named Bhaskar Kulkarni, had tried to kill too, to our only Maratha king Great Shivaji. (12) It is now well known that Right of Education was opened to Non Brahman Hindus too first time, by India’s British rulers, in 1800 th century. That right of education was also preserved solely for Brahmans like Hinduism’s head priests ship. Education or literacy was banned to Hindu kings too. Posting of a non warrior but right of education’s sole proprietor Brahman as a Peshava i.e. premier, by Shivaji in his kingdom was a mere adjustment or necessity for handling correspondence with then Muslim rulers and Europeans visitors and traders. Great Maratha king Chhatrapati Shivaji was well aware with selfish and treacherous Brahmans. Hinduism defines killing of Brahmans as greatest sin followed by cow’s killing. No doubt Shivaji was totally against of cows slaughtering. But he did not hesitate to kill his attacker clerk of Muslim knight Afzalkhan, bastard Bhaskar Kulkarni, though he was Brahma. (13) It is falsely being imposed that these selfish and treacherous Brahmans were respectable for great Shivaji, labeling him “Go Brahman pratipalak”. Brahman Peshava lastly doomed that only Maratha kingdom in India formed by Chhatrapati Shivaji, because of their unnatural lusts and greed. (14) When impressed with Muslim Arab sailors’ huge profit from marine trade, to grab that opportunity too, to skip Hinduism’s banning on sea travel, Brahmans did not hesitated to convert at least one male member of their families voluntarily to Islam. Those converted Muslim families are known as MUSLIM MOPALAS in south India’s Kerala state. Irony is these Mopalas had revolted against Indian government, and are hard orthodox, though Kerala is having highest education ratio in India. (15) It is now well proven that Brahmans are basically from Mid East’s Prussia or Iran. It is also accepted fact that Brahmans are actually bloodily linked with Islam’s Prophet Mohammed. It is also in history that our Indian Brahmans did not forget their blood linage linked with Islam’s prophet Mohammed’s family. Remembering that link with Mohammed, to help Mohammed’s grand son Hussein in his war for Caliphate’s crown, against his own relations, Brahmans had rushed to Karbala near Mecca in Saudi Arabia from distant India. For that help to Hussein, Hussein had honored these Brahman, by calling them “Husseini Brahmans”. And these Brahmans, who are now showing themselves as great enemies of those Mid East Deserts religions Islam and Christian, shamelessly prided too to call themselves as HUSSEINI BRAHMANS. Are not our Hinduism’s sole proprietors Brahmans, MUSLIMS in realty? HAVE THE BRAHMANS RIGHT TO USE GREAT MARATHA KING SHIVAJI’S NAME AND IDOLS FOR IMPRESSING THE NON BRAHMAN ORIGINAL NATIVE INDIANS, LIKE NOWADAYS?AND HAVE THEY ANY MORAL RIGHT TO PROVOKE INDIANS AGAINST MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS IF THEY SERVED THEM MORE DEICATED THAN HINDU KINGS? (From process of correcting each other and strict observance of main rule of elimination for correction, seems now that Caliphate’s throne may not remain hereditary any more.) (16)On mere whispered publicity, the rumor of sipping milk by Lord Ganesha’s lifeless photos and idols, spread by Brahmans, Indian Hindus had became hysteric to feed milk to lifeless photos and idols of lord Ganesha. That rumor of milk sipping was so well and pre planned that Shiv Sena’s stalwart Square Kohinoor diamond leader Mr. Manohar Joshi also spoke in support of it. Though Mr. Joshi is also an orthodox Brahman, he is not suppose to support such foolish things, if he runs tuition classes and colleges where students study modern science and if he had worked as speaker of our parliament at the mercy o Mr. Bal Thakre. (17) It is reported secretly that the rumor was created by an over drugged dead BJP member Mr. Vivek Maitra, in company of BJP’s FEEL GOOD MISSION PROPAGATOR, late Mr. PRAMOD MAHAJAN’s drugs addict only son Rahul Mahajan. Mr. Vivek Maitra was then P.A. to then home minister of Maharashtra late Mr. Gopinath Mundhe, in a ministerial bungalow named Ramtek in Mumbai. Ramtek is adjacent to BJP leader Miss Shaina N.C. (Nana Chudasama)’s bungalow, which is on state Government’s encroached land and very near to sea in rich and prime area of Malabar hill.(18) To highlight or underline us Indians’ nature, who are abused as most pretenders by European authors and travelers, of relying totally on not only useless but treacherous peoples or persons, imposed on us, is the only intention of placing this dirty but notable and useful data. Instead of showering extra rich on socially or nationally useless or harmful people, by glorifying them with such awards, people who are devoted for betterment of this India and its nationals by heart, deserve such strengthening by awarding them glorification this way. Why we hide our originality? By wearing tiger’s mask for collecting alms for tigers, tigers will not be benefitted. Showing reality of tigers’ latest conditions may only be able to be of use for begging alms for them. Hiding cancer’ knot or aids and decorating face, may be beneficial for person carrying it, but by luring peoples with such falsely decorated faces with decomposed body, whole society will be decomposed. Such peoples who hide cancer or aids and enjoying decorated faces are responsible for ruining others and whole society too. (19)So called swamis Mr. Vivekananda, Mr. Arbindo, or latest Shri Shri Ravi etc. Brahmans hide cancer of castism of Hinduism owned by Muslim Mohammed’s related and basically foreigner Brahmans, and try to glorify Hinduism. Dirtiest and inhuman caste system, which authorized intolerance of cruel and inhumane nature, is the cancer and aids of Hinduism. What are fruits of glorifying Hinduism with Caste systems cancer? Is the world turned to Hinduism? Nope. On the contrary Hindus, like second Jihadist John Mr. Dhavan, who is a Kashmiri Brahman, are also seen adopting straightly intolerance supporting Islam. USA.s presidential candidate, Mr. Bobby Jindal turned to Christianity. It is irony to note that Islam or Christianity was forced on Non Brahman Native Indians, but stalwart and renowned figures from our Hinduism’s owner Brahmans like Kaphir Malik, Karalee Mopalas, recently past Rev. Tilak, Marathi poet Mr. Madhav Julian did not bother to kick their Hinduism and voluntarily adopted conversions. Non Brahman Indians are really appreciable. They sacrificed and fought for protecting foreigner Brahmans Hinduism, with its dirtiest caste system, when Brahmans not only kicked off Hinduism as explained above, but with Dr B.R. Ambedkar they burnt their created Hinduism’s Manifesto Manusmruti too. It is reasonably feared that one day some Brahman Shankaracharya too, may not hesitate to convert himself in other religion, if he is offered any topmost post like USA presidential election’s originally Indian candidate Mr. Bobby Jindal. (20) Politicians, well placed and established ones are seen entertaining the common peoples, whose labor is the only source of creation of wealth. In the past keeping right of education in own hands, Brahmans did not wish to allow the common man to become knowledgeable. (probably that’s why, still their followers Non Brahmans wish to remain dumb, relying totally on them). These Kumbh Melas or festivals and Bhajan, Kirtan, Varis etc. are created to keep the non Brahman continuously engaged or dumb and for allowing space or scope to their natural hysteric instincts. Have you seen any of Brahman Shankaracharya dipping himself in any dirty water during any Kumbh Melas? For entertaining or temporarily satisfying common people politicians use such imposed heroic figures, which are useless for upliftment of downtrodden and common people. Politicians themselves are reluctant or rather incapable to handle knowledgeable or learned people. They want peoples, who do not raise voice against them. Politicians like Brahmans are sheep or cattle manning shepherds. Wolves or tigers who want to own one or two of their cattle are their enemies. People like Mr. Devan unfortunately or intentionally ignore these facts. (21) Yes I am anti national, if my thoughts are disproved. It is expected from the society who praises Hindu princess Jodha marrying Muslim king Akbar, and declare Muslims as their enemies. Yes I am anti national if I wish to up root the cancer of dirty Indian caste system. Yes I am anti national if I always wished to abuse the torturing of untouchables now too. Yes I am anti national if I exposed foolishness of RSS’s chief Mr. Mohan Bhagvat, who fantastically advised Indians to extract sacred cow’s blood by inserting siphon in her neck like his loving Masai community’s warriors of Africa, instead of straightway killing the cow. Yes I am anti national if I abuse people, who though were useless had reserved dominance over untouchables for 5000 years and turned anti social reservation for untouchables within 70 years only. Yes I am anti national if I highlighted the fact about 5000 year old reservation of post of Shankaracharyas and all priest exclusively for Brahmans, first time. Yes I am anti national if I disclosed intention of Brahmans behind founding now ruler organization of RSS. Yes I am anti national if I stated that supporting murder of innocent hermit Shambuk from untouchables, by lord Rama in epic Ramayana can not be work of untouchables’ colleague fisherman Valmiki if literacy was then exclusively Brahmans’ monopoly. Yes I am anti national if I placed that Manusmruti is also creation of Brahmans, as none of Non Brahman original native Indians human group could have preferred to be free slaves of only 3, ½% of total Indian population Brahman in own mother land India. Yes I am anti national if I expose and abuse people for their anti national and anti social sins. Yes I am anti national if I laugh at farmers who suicide comparing them with 5000 years old inhuman and cruel torturing and treatment sufferer untouchables of India, who are homeless too. Yes I am antinational if I insist for honor of poor and deprived ones, and demand equal distribution of abnormally swollen wealth and powers. Yes I am anti national if I reasonably abuse to RSS's pets Baniya Mr. Modi etc. who were seen hysteric while abusing then ruling government's honest and senior peoples, before last parliamentary general election. Pretensions or Masks do not last long. We have to come forward with whatever we have. Let the world criticize us for our lacking. At least we will know what is wrong with us. It will definitely help us to lessen our vulnerability experienced on Pakistan boarder. Am I allowed to say Jai Hind?