Godse & Gandhi

******############# GANDHI XX & XXGODASE #############*************** #Great Indian leader, father of this nation India, was murdered by Nathuram Godase. Godase was a Brahman. I respect Brahman veer Savarkar, as one of the true Brahmans like Saane Guruji, and other Brahmans and CKPs(castes equivalent to Brahmans but open non vegetarians), attached with dalit's achhoot leader, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar's mission of making India truly caste less. Though veer Savarkar denied his link with Godase, and his act of murdering Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, it is an open secret that Nathuram Godase was his child. Veer Savarkar had the quality of inspiring others. RSS's organizer Dr Baliram Hegadevar was also great admirer & follower too of Mr. Savarkar. At the hint of veer Savarkar and inspired by him only, RSS was formed by Mr. Hegadevar. Otherwise till then Mr. Hegadevar was not at all a known figure in India. He has no credit also of participation in any activities of freedom fighting. Recent post on Google+ of Godase and though indirectly but in favor of Godase, indicates that Godase was filled with tremendous anger against Mr. M.K. Gandhi. It is not cleared by this particular post, as to why Godase was so furious against Mr. Gandhi? One reason mostly discussed and propagated is Gandhi’s extreme favoritism toward Muslims. If it is rumored as the only reason of murder of Mr. Gandhi, by Godase, then I must say that either he or the creators of that rumor were fool, or are making others fool, taking false cover of patriotism or are psychics like Godase, who did this act of murdering Gandhi, hysterically. It is learned that Godase was an educated person. Forget about his education, but he himself being from orthodox Brahmans and being veer Savarkar’s pet, he is supposed to be, must well acknowledged with veer Savarkar’s observed noting about Brahman’s most selfish, opportunist & traitor's mentality and favoring behavior toward Muslims, from long past. Veer Savarkar has described in his books that, Brahmans from south India had developed practice of circumcise and convert their at least one male family member to Muslim, just for gaining benefit of fishing and sea transport business, as like Arab did. Those converted Muslims are known as Mopalas. These Mopalas had revolted against Hindu ruling in recent past, as being experienced nowadays in Kashmir, where once forcibly converted Muslim Kashmiri pandits (Brahmans) are creating trouble. Godase’s Brahman community had announced their blood link, with Islam founder Prophet Mohammed, and had rushed to help, his grand son Hussein, in his war for Throne, at Karbala, near Mecca in Middle East’s desert. These Godase’s Brahmans served every invaders of India. Godase must knew that, past Congress president and freedom fighter Mr. Baal Gangadhar Tilak’s research that, these Brahmans of India, are Aryans by breed and they were originally effused from North Pole. After effusing from North Pole they spread all over Europe. Before crossing our Sindhu River to enter in India, these Brahman’s last camp was in the west Asia, i.e. Middle East. In that desert three religions claiming Adam and Eave as originators of mankind were born. Prophets of all these three religions have claimed some or other relation with god. God is believed as well doer. They believe in existence of Shaitan or Satan also, who troubles. These all three desert born religions were born very later after native Indian Prophet of Buddhism religion, Lord Buddha introduced Buddhism. Lord Buddha has not claimed any relation with any unknown God and Satan. Lord Buddha was a king of his kingdom; he did not acquired kingdom, caliphate or lord ship, after being known as Prophet. Most importantly he was not Brahman i.e.Aryan, by breed. Brahmans are not witnessed as warrior or kings, till Maratha’s Great King Shivaji first made them to fight and posted as Peshava, in past Indian history. They served all European Christian and Muslim invaders dedicated. They were so dedicated that one Brahman named Kulkarni, had attacked to kill Maratha great king Shivaji also, while protecting Muslim’s Mughal Aurangzeb’s knight Afzal Khan. Brahman Pandit Neharu has intentionally defamed Shivaji as robber, to glorify Rajputs of Rajasthan, though these boasters of culture of SATI and JOHAR had physically and mentally surrendered to invader Muslim rulers, by offering many Hindu princesses like JODHA to Muslim king Akbar and others. Is not this behavior of so called brave and kingly Rajputs of India matching with pimps, and neighboring state Gujarat’s Banyas? Great Shivaji, along with his minor prince Sambhaji, had escaped brilliantly from Muslim Mughal Aurangzeb’s extremely tight custody and travelling long way from Agra, had reached safely in Maharashtra, with his minor prince Sambhaji. Muslim Mughal Aurangzeb’s knight Afzal khan was a mountain and double in height than Shivaji. He had planned to kill Shivaji, by stabbing with a dragger hidden in his person cunningly, while hugging Shivaji by notifying him as his colleague’s son. But great smart Shivaji foiled his plan, and killed that mountain of man Muslim Afazalkhan alone. Not necessary to mention that Shivaji killed that Brahman body guard of Muslim Afazalkhan also, though Brahmans were protected from killing, as per so called Hindu’s Dharma Shastras. When Brahmans did not hesitate to circumcise and convert to Muslim just for gain from sea trade, when they helped Muslim Hussein in his war for Throne in middle east, calling and priding themselves as Husseini Brahmans, when they served dedicated to Muslim rulers (Christians also), and tried to kill Great Shivaji for Muslim, how Godase’s anger against Gandhi can be held as right or reasonable too, if Baniya i. e. trader, Gandhi favored Muslims? Veer Savarkar’s noted observations of Brahmans indicates, they are and were great pretenders in India. When their one family member, voluntarily converted as Muslim Mopala, had not bothered to eat cow’s meat at the time of baptism of Muslim, their government now ban beef eating to, may be forcibly converted Muslims too. When they, objected re conversion of Kashmir’s Muslim to their original identity of Kashmiri Pandits, i. e. Hindus in the past, now they enjoy arranging GHAR WAPSI, i.e. poor Muslims re conversion to Hinduism. By this clear picture of Muslim favoring Brahmans, orthodox Brahman Godase’s stand for anger against Gandhi, just because of his favoring Muslim, totally collapses and foolish. It was his decisive pretention only, or it intentionally is being propagated as such. He, or the propagators are trying to fool the nationals and hence to the nation. Was he psychic? His life history doesn’t say so. More than Gandhi, Godase’s Brahmans helped Muslims. More than not Gandhi only but more than all native Indians also, these first invader batches of Aryans, i.e. Brahmans are closely linked with the Muslims. After discarding Godase ’s claimed reason for his act of murdering Gandhi, blaming him favoritism toward Muslims, now it become necessary to find about true reasons of Godase’s cowardice act of killing that aged Baniya Gandhi, by scanning Godase’s mentor’s policies and fixed targets. Godase’s mentor, Veer Savarkar, and by product of his inspiration RSS’s history, activities, open or hidden targets and aims, then naturally come on anvil, as alone Godase was not at all capable of planning such historical murder and its compliance. As observed above, though one Brahman Arya Chanakya is clamed to be as king maker, i. e. maker of Emperor Chandragupta, (as like Maharashtra’s one of orthodox Brahman’s so called saint, Samarth Ramdas is being imposed, as teacher or mentor of Maratha’s great king Shivaji, though history is different), Brahmans were not known as kings or warriors in Indian History. Otherwise also if, as per Hindu’s holy books like Manusmruti and total Vedas, they were entitled to claim any thing from any body, for their livelihood, they had no binding of fighting for something or plough their gifted fields too. Great king Shivaji first time made them warrior, though he had bad experience from one of their quality, at the time of killing Muslim knight Afazalkhan. Brahmans were posted as Peshava in Shivaji’s kingdom, which as per their treacherous nature doomed that only Maratha kingdom. That taste of ruler ship opened, new field for their dominance, in addition to, totally their dominated field of religious rites. No doubt Brahmans were proved brilliant, as they only created unique caste system of India. By that caste system, these primary Indian invaders cunningly divided the different DNA holder natives of India, in rank wise slaves. By this imposed caste system, India’s original natives were made slaves of caste system’s topper Brahmans, for totally free, and for all types of services, including unnatural sex also. Godase is being treated as hero by mostly Brahmans and their obsessed few native Indians. Veer Savarkar has described Brahmans mentality by the example of Brahman converted Mopalas. It indicates indirectly, their selfish, opportunists and pretender’s qualities. For last five thousands of years Brahman enjoyed all the benefits and perks of this Indian caste system. This caste system which made the natives slaves, in their own country, is mentioned as per so called Holy books of Hindus, which are still revered by every native Hindu Indians strictly. Brahmans had already started to fuck these holy books, when they converted their family’s male person to Muslim as Mopalas for mere gain. They have fucked these Hindu Holy books when many of them, like Pandita Ramabai, Rev. Tilak, converted to Christian voluntarily. They have fucked these Hindu holy books by settling in foreign countries first before all, by breaking rule of banned sea crossing. They fucked Hindu Holy books by eating cow’s meat also, after becoming chefs in continental hotels, and after marrying Muslim or Christian as groom or brides. Can it be stated strongly that, these all Hindu holy books are scripted by any non Brahman or by original Indian natives? How any non Brahman group of native human Indian, will wish to bind him self voluntarily as free slave for these invader Brahman? If some non Brahman native still believes that these Hindu holy books are scripted by god, then he deserves and is bound to be fucked by Brahmans as before, from last five thousand years. Reason of killing of Baniya Gandhi by Godase can not be labeled as killing of any law breaker’s also, though it is born practice of all blood suckers Baniya, as Godase or all Brahmans were not known against such law breakers. Then only reason of killing Gandhi can be guessed and traced, is the starting of freedom fight. This air of fight for freedom was initially blown or created by Brahmans on war field, after fall of Brahman rani Laxmi, and after humiliating fall of peshava’s regime. Then most educated Brahmans, who had turned their loyalty to British, after fall of Muslim rulers, along with Parsees, joined Indian national Congress with the aim of freedom sighting British’ defeats, after 2nd world war. This Indian national Congress was formed by British Madame Query. Brahmans, especially from Maharashtra who had then tasted ruler ship, and learnt lesson of real patriotism and self respect from Maratha Great king Shivaji’s son Sambhaji, wanted alone their dominance again in India, though Baniya Gandhi also had cunningly favored Nehru, Shastri, Rajendra Prasad etc majority of Brahmans in the first ministry of India, after sighted departure of British. It is astonishing that, though these Brahmans were not known as opposing to any invaders, or opposing to conversions carried out by the invaders, they had managed to maintain their dominance over the remaining native Hindus, constant as before. Brahman Shankaracharyas of all Pithas (seats), were revered in same manners by the natives, as they were before intrusion of invaders. These Brahmans of Maharashtra, who only, from all Brahmans of India had tasted experience of ruler ship, do not wish to come out from that mentality. They wished to reestablish their dominance, as it was in Peshava’s ruling. Brahmans from other parts of India had also dominance in Hindus, but limited for religious matters. They were contended with that limited dominance also, as they were entitled to demand any thing from all native Hindus and had not to do any laborious job for their livelihood. Many of them were very near and dear to Baniya Gandhi, but none of them dared to challenge or abuse this Baniya Gandhi, like Maharashtra’s Brahmans and their charmed natives. So behind the murder of Gandhi fierce ambition of Brahmans, of regaining the rulers post also, in addition to the posts of religious posts, can be the only reason. It is noticeable that, though Brahmans in the past Indian history never had sword in their hand, and still so called Hindu religion was protected and saved. This Hindu religion and its heads Brahmans both were protected and saved by these natives, who were in real free slaves to Brahman. Brahmans boast of making Emperor Chandragupta as king. It may be true if laborious work like furrowing their own farm was also done by natives, to fight and spill their blood for their only imposed Hindu religion was hardly impossible thing for them. What did these native gained by these Brahmans? Only blessings of these Brahmans who were next to god or mediator of god were the gifts to these natives, who served these Brahmans. To ask to these natives as, why they were never offered the posts of Shankaracharya of any minor Pith (chair) also, though they protected Brahmans and Hindu religion, or though they spent most of their life’s period in praising gods and Brahman, will be labeled as a silly question. Asking same question to the lowest rankers, i.e. untouchable scheduled caste dalit, is beyond imagination. If for name sake it is taken granted that, Nathuram had a fierce anger against Gandhi which resulted in his murder, then to kill Gandhi was the first right of Indian untouchables fro lowest rank of Indian castism. More than this Brahman Godase, Indian untouchables Dalits had reason to kill this Baniya Gandhi, as he had cheated by opposing Hindu code bill. And untouchable dalits had proven guts and spirit also, when their India’s only untouchable’s army unit, Mahaar Battalion’s five hundred soldiers had defeated twenty five thousands’ army of Maratha Peshava. But they did not want to dirt their hands by killing that Baniya Gandhi. They had full faith in their untouchable leader, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, i.e. Dr B.R. Ambedkar, who had saved life of that Baniya, instead of allowing him to die, like he saved India, by accepting Indian natives religion, Buddhism instead of middle east’s 3rd rank religion Islam, though he was tried to be bribed for that. On this observed back ground Nathuram’s act of killing an aged helpless and useless Baniya Gandhi must be labeled as heinous. Nathuram and his planners behind the curtain are definitely condemn able!